IMBA - International Mountain Bicycling Association
What would we do without trails?

Colorado Reaches Pinnacle in 2002 IMBA Mountain Bike Access Report Card

For Immediate Release
11-27-02
Contact: Dan Vardamis, advocacy coordinator

303-545-9011

Endless miles of high-altitude and desert singletrack, superb Rocky Mountain scenery, impeccably organized advocacy groups and abundant trail maps helped push Colorado to the top of the class in the 2002 International Mountain Bicycling Association's Mountain Bike Access Report Card with an A-minus grade.

IMBA's Report Card is an annual assessment of the status of mountain biking in U.S. states, Canadian provinces and other countries. It was created three years ago to help IMBA manage the effectiveness of its efforts to preserve trail access for mountain bikers and create new opportunities where they are needed.

For Colorado, no access news is good news. The past year was quiet for mountain bikers in the central Rockies, as numerous issues connected to new U.S. Forest plans and Wilderness proposals either dissolved or were addressed effectively. The U.S. economic downturn slowed the state's rampant growth, leveling congestion on trails. Meanwhile, Colorado advocacy groups continue to do great work in all corners of the state. Unlike some western states with abundant but hard-to-find riding, Colorado trails are well mapped. Finally, destinations like Fruita, Crested Butte and Durango continue to attract cyclists from all corners of the world.

Other states, regions and countries also graded well in the 2002 IMBA Report Card. South Dakota, Utah, British Columbia, Italy, Wales and the Yukon all earned A-minus grades. Meanwhile, defending 2000 and 2001 champ Idaho dropped slightly from an A grade to an A-minus because of the overlap of a new Wilderness proposal with popular riding areas.

On the other end of the spectrum, report card grades confirmed that many states and regions need work. Mississippi received the lowest grade in the 2002 IMBA Report Card, a D+, because the state has few organized mountain bike advocacy groups.

The most populated U.S. state, California, dropped a full letter grade to a C. California has lots of outstanding riding, but 2002 has been a tough year for advocates in the state. In southern California, user conflict and unauthorized trails tested relationships with land managers. In the Bay Area, Oakland advocates worked hard to counter an effort to curtail bike access in Joaquin Miller Park. Meanwhile, mountain bikers find themselves in a tricky position regarding U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer's new statewide Wilderness proposal: cyclists support environmental protection and new Wilderness, but this proposal - if adopted as is - would eliminate bike use on many popular trails.

"The report card is a useful tool for IMBA and our local advocates," said IMBA executive director Tim Blumenthal. "It's a great way for us to see where we have made progress and are doing well. In addition, it helps us focus our attention on places where mountain biking needs work."

Grades are based on many factors: amount of singletrack, effectiveness of local mountain bike groups, land manager relations, an IMBA website survey, and feedback from IMBA leaders.

Grades and comments are listed below:

2002 IMBA Mountain Bike Access U.S. Report Card

StateGradePhatFlatTrend
ColoradoA-Unlimited singletrack, mountains, mapsUrban access requires steady vigilanceBetter
IdahoA-Smooth Sun Valley singletrackProposed Wilderness overlaps trailsWorse
South DakotaA-Black Hills riding world-classNeed to know locals to find best trailssame
UtahA-Improved access near Salt Lake CityDesert trails tough to manageBetter
AlaskaB+Anchorage trails, few access issuesMost areas terra incognitasame
ArizonaB+Desert, mtns, urban: 'zona has it allSouthern AZ needs more singletracksame
ArkansasB+Womble & Ouachita, solid advocatesHotter than a Hot Spring in Julysame
FloridaB+Many strong clubs build trailsToo much sand in some areassame
KentuckyB+New trail opportunities in LouisvilleHorses and hoops rulesame
MassachusettsB+NEMBA top regional advocacy groupFreeride controversy near Bostonsame
MichiganB+New trails in urban fringeLimited access to federal landssame
MissouriB+Kansas City, St. Louis trails blossomVolunteers needed for trailworkBetter
MontanaB+Missoula, Whitefish, Bozeman are epicWinter from October-MayBetter
NebraskaB+New trails near Omaha, LincolnMuch of state is private farmlandBetter
New MexicoB+Urban access solid in AlbuquerqueForests ravaged by fire, minimal infosame
North DakotaB+Maah Daah Hey Trail primoMore singletrack needed in eastsame
West VirginiaB+Monongahela N.F. steep and deepHunting and motorized come firstsame
DelawareBExperienced core of trailbuildersLimited public landsame
GeorgiaBSORBA's trailbuilding arsenalLimited availability in metro AtlantaBetter
MaineBMountain bikers getting organizedMish-mash trail systemsame
MarylandBMaryland club solves problemsTypical urban trail problemssame
NevadaBPublic land abundantLittle trails info: the Area 51 of MBingWorse
North CarolinaBTrails in west are superLack of trails, advocacy in eastsame
OklahomaBGreat land manager relationsMost of state private landBetter
OregonBMacKenzie River Trail five starsWilderness needs addressingsame
TexasBSolid statewide org, MB parks, racingHouston heats up...againsame
VirginiaBAll good 'cept suburban DC and...Not much riding in Richmondsame
WashingtonBStatewide access varied, outstandingSeattle improving, but still limitedBetter
WyomingBRiding matches skiing in JacksonMore maps, guidebooks neededsame
ConnecticutB-Solid advocates, improving accessLots of people in a small spaceBetter
HawaiiB-Surfing + riding = paradise?Lack of well built trailssame
IndianaB-Solid bicycling coalitionBird didn't bike. So why should you?same
New HampshireB-White Mountain NF trailsUnauthorized trails near Manchestersame
OhioB-More trails, energetic clubsNo access near ClevelandBetter
TennesseeB-Solid advocacy groups aboundMore volunteers neededsame
WisconsinB-WORBA, Trek lead cycling communitySouthern Wisconsin access cheesysame
MinnesotaC+Improved leadership, industry supportMinneapolis is a constant battleBetter
New YorkC+Trails in Westchester, L.I., 'dacksBorough riding still bannedBetter
PennsylvaniaC+Strong relations with DCNRState Game Land trails curtailedWorse
South CarolinaC+SORBA's presence = USFS partnershipOld school park managementWorse
VermontC+Ski areas, private MB resorts Red light on Green Mountain accessWorse
AlabamaCBUMP continues to do great workSport barely on public radar screensame
CaliforniaCBay Area advocates step upWilderness, SoCal & Oakland tenseWorse
IowaCTopography + solid club = solid futureProgress taking timesame
New JerseyCTop notch patrol, club in southJORBA needs yousame
Rhode IslandCArcadia forest trails solidSmall state, not much verticalsame
IllinoisC-Improving organization statewideMore trails needed near Chicagosame
KansasC-Lawrence trails outstandingFarming rules, riding sufferssame
LouisianaC-New advocates at workNew trails limited...so farBetter
MississippiD+Abundant forests provide accessBiking organizations absent in '02Worse

Grading Beyond Our Borders

Mindful of our growing work outside the U.S., IMBA expanded the global mountain bike report card in '02 to include a number of countries worldwide where IMBA is active. For more information on IMBA's international network visit www.imba.com/international.

2002 IMBA Global Report Card

Canada

  • British Columbia: A-
    Phat: Outstanding clubs, youth program, trails; Freeride focus
    Flat: More sustainable trails needed near Vancouver
  • Yukon: A-
    Phat: Whitehorse, Dawson are emerging mountain bike meccas
    Flat: Rest of province is vast unknown, grizzly bears, winter
  • Ontario: B+
    Phat: Improved advocacy organization, new trails
    Flat: Unauthorized trails near Toronto
  • Quebec: B
    Phat: Ski areas offer outstanding trails
    Flat: Trail tensions near Montreal
  • Alberta: B-
    Phat: Riding Rocks in Canadian Rockies
    Flat: Calgary trail closures

United Kingdom

  • Wales: A-
    Phat: Top-notch trailbuilding creates premier MB destination
    Flat: Few knew how good it was...until now
  • Scotland: B+
    Phat: Awesome technical trails, trailbuilders, geography
    Flat: Advocacy organization needs improvement
  • England: C+
    Phat: Solid leadership, passionate freeriding movement
    Flat: Lack of singletrack, needs advocacy muscle
  • Northern Ireland: C-
    Phat: Vast potential, energetic advocates
    Flat: Not much singletrack yet

Italy: A-
Phat: 2,000 year old trails, few trail conflicts, never flat, culture
Flat: Need better maps, broad based advocacy group needed

Australia: B
Phat: Pockets of great singletrack, emerging advocacy structure
Flat: Trail user conflict, trailbuilding skills need work

See the Complete 2002 Access Report in the Winter Trail News


Help | Site Map | Copyright
IMBA Homepage Join IMBA Now!